What Marriage Means

Conservative Republican Ted Olson defends right to marry in California

admin — Thu, 04 Mar 2010 16:18:00 +0000

The historic Proposition 8 trial in California is nearing the final stages as lawyers on both sides of the same-sex marriage argument set out their views on the evidence presented throughout the course of the trial lasting much of January. Conservative republican and former U.S. Solicitor General Ted Olson is representing a same-sex couple in California challenging the passage of Proposition 8. Lawyers on both sides have one more shot at arguing their case before Chief U.S. District Judge Vaughn Walker in closing arguments before a decision is rendered.

Based upon the ruling issued by Judge Walker, the wording of his decision could have minimal implications for California residents or more far-reaching implications for civil rights at all levels of government:

Prop. 8, approved by 52 percent of the voters in November 2008, amended the California Constitution to prohibit same-sex marriage, overturning a May 2008 state Supreme Court ruling that extended marital rights to gays and lesbians. The state court upheld the initiative last May while also upholding 18,000 same-sex marriages performed in the state before Prop. 8 passed.

Because Prop. 8 eliminated rights that the California court had granted, plaintiffs in the federal suit want Walker to put it in the same category as a 1992 Colorado initiative that overturned local gay-rights laws and prohibited future anti-discrimination measures. The U.S. Supreme Court struck down the Colorado initiative in 1996 and said its sole purpose was to harm a disfavored minority.

Prop. 8’s “express and stated purpose … was to strip gay and lesbian individuals of constitutional rights” they had won in the state court, plaintiffs’ lawyers said. They said Yes on 8 campaign messages “echoed fears that children must be ‘protected’ from gay and lesbian people.”

Read more in the San Francisco Chronicle

Walker, sensing the challenge ultimately may be decided by the U.S. Supreme Court, held a full-blown trial to give each side the opportunity to provide a factual basis for their arguments for and against same-sex marriage.

The trial briefs in many respects reflect the fact the trial was primarily focused on testimony from the plaintiffs’ side, with experts who testified on everything from the history of discrimination against gay people to the scope of gay and lesbian political clout.

The plaintiffs also presented more emotional testimony, including from the two couples themselves and San Diego Mayor Jerry Sanders, a Republican who testified on his political change of heart after learning his daughter is lesbian.

Marriage Equality Has Its First Day In The Nation’s Capitol

admin — Wed, 03 Mar 2010 18:22:03 +0000

The District of Columbia started issuing marriage licensesto same-sex couples at 12:01 am as part of the city’s new civil marriage equality law. According to the Washington Post, at least fifty couples lined up before District office opened to get licenses, and hundreds are expected throughout the day.

The new law means a lot for couples, many of whom never believed they would have the opportunity:

Republican Craig Max has dreamed for years of having the ultimate D.C. wedding — a National Cathedral ceremony, followed by a rooftop reception for 200 overlooking the National Mall at the Kennedy Center. But the Log Cabin Republicans boardmember didn’t expect he’d ever be able to marry his partner, former Supreme Court librarian Michael Zurat, until today.

The couple is one of many same-sex Washington couples who are expected to line up outside the District Superior Courthouse today, the first day that same-sex couples can apply for a marriage license under the District’s new gay marriage law.

The law has many grappling with new, uncharted territory — in both their love lives and work lives.

“Right now we’re in a gray zone between being engaged and fully married and having that commitment,” said Max, who recently gave Zurat an engagement ring. “Now we will actually reach our goal of having a formal and recognized within the traditional definition that we view our relationship.”

It will also give them definition to a four-year relationship, allow them to further solidify estate planning and guarantee them hospital visitation rights that are currently only secured under the District’s domestic partnership rights.

Maryland Attorney General: State To Recognize Same-Sex Unions

admin — Thu, 25 Feb 2010 18:25:31 +0000

Maryland Attorney General Douglas Gansler issued an opinon that Maryland law requires the state to recognize same-sex unions performed in other states:

The opinion appears to place Maryland alongside New York in its view of out-of-state gay marriages. Until now, New York was the only state that didn’t perform same-sex weddings but offered gay couples married elsewhere the same legal protections that married heterosexual couples enjoy.

Washington, D.C., which is expected to begin issuing marriage licenses to gay couples this spring, also honors same-sex marriages performed elsewhere. California recognizes some out-of-state gay marriages.

Attorney General Douglas Gansler issued his opinion Wednesday in response to a lawmaker’s question about how the state should regard gay couples legally wed elsewhere.

“State agencies in Maryland will recognize out-of-state gay marriages as of right now,” Mr. Gansler said at a press conference, according to The Washington Post.

Since Washington is set to begin performing same-sex marriages in the coming weeks, there is some concern among state legislators that gay couples in Maryland will simply marry in Washington and sidestep the state’s law. According to The Baltimore Sun, one lawmaker has introduced a bill that would ban the state from honoring those unions.

Gansler appears to be attempting to preempt that move.

Still, in his written decision, he said, “what we say in this opinion is a prediction, not a prescription” about how Maryland’s court would view the matter.

Read more about Gansler’s decision in The Baltimore Sun.

Poll Backs Marriage Equality in the Nation’s Capitol

admin — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 21:27:15 +0000

A poll conducted for the Washington Post shows that a majority of voters back the right to marry for all couples regardless of their sexual orientation. The poll does show a significant racial divide on the subject; while eithty-three percent of white voters back marriage equality, only thirty-seven percent of African American voters are supportive. There is also significant support for a referendum to sustain the law 2009 law passed by the City Council.

Although most District residents are in sync with the council in support of same-sex marriage, there is widespread public support for putting the question to a city-wide vote.

Nearly six in 10 residents say they would prefer to vote on the issue. City leaders have said a public vote would be discriminatory. “I don’t think it should be a decree made by the government,” said Pablo Barreyro, 72, of Chevy Chase. “I don’t think it should be left to a small party of politicians. . . . I really wonder what the outcome would be if it becomes available for public input.”

If it lands on the ballot, however, the District would be well positioned to become the first state-level jurisdiction in the country where voters embraced same-sex marriage, according to the poll.

Nearly six in 10 D.C. residents, including 83 percent of whites, favor making it legal for gay couples to marry.

…

But some divisions are evident in the local black community on this issue, with sharp divides by church attendance and education.

One in five African Americans who attend church services weekly favor same-sex marriage, and support rises to 47 percent among those who attend less often. A narrow majority of black college graduates supports gay marriage, compared with about a third of African Americans with less formal education.

Read more about marriage equality in Washington, DC in the Washington Post.

Cindy McCain Joins The Fight For Marriage Equality

admin — Thu, 21 Jan 2010 18:14:48 +0000

CBS News reports that Cindy McCain, the wife of 2008 Republican Presidential Nominee Senator John McCain publicly joined the fight for the right for marriage equality. Appearing in a photoshoot by Adam Bouska with tape over her mouth and a “NOH8″ logo on her face, McCain is hoping her position can bring attention to the efforts to overturn California’s Proposition 8, which banned same-sex marriage.

McCain’s appearance comes as former Bush Adminstration Solicitor General Ted Olson, is in Court challenging Proposition 8, who recently published a column in Newsweek arguing his belief in the fundemental right for gay and lesbian couples to marry. Olson’s arguments were joined by Robert Levy, Chairman of the Cato Institute and conservative Fox News Contibutor Margaret Hoover in speaking out on the conservative case for marriage.

McCain, who approached the campaign offering her support, having been a champion for her daughter Meghan McCain, a vocal advocate for same-sex marriage and the keynote speaker at the 2009 Log Cabin Republican National Convention. In a piece, published by GayPolitics.com, McCain is joined by a number of notable Republican leaders, including Vice President Dick Cheney, McCain-Palin Campaign Manager Scott Schmidt, California Governor Arnold Schwarzeger, San Diego Mayor Jerry Sanders, Massachussets Republican Gubernatorial Candidate Charlie Baker who is running with openly gay Richard Tisei, among many more.

Prop 8 Trial Highlights Gays Ability to Raise Children

admin — Mon, 18 Jan 2010 19:28:52 +0000

Reuters analyzes one of the central claims made against same-sex marriage, whether gays can raise children:

The quality of the relationship between the child and the parents, the relationship between the parents, and the economic resources available to the family, were the top issues for healthy children,’ [Michael Lamb, head of the Social and Developmental Psychology Department at Cambridge University] said.

Kids had no trouble with their own sexual identity or other development due to growing up with same-sex parents, he argued, and the ways fathers and mothers interacted with kids was not as important as having two parents, he said.

“Children clearly benefit when they have two parents, both of them actively involved,” said Lamb. Asked if mothers and fathers interacted differently with children, he replied, “It is now quite clear that those differences in and of themselves do not significantly affect children’s adjustment,” he said.

Studies reject the conclusion that children are abused more when raised by same-sex couples.

“There is no evidence that gays or lesbians are more likely to sexually abuse children,” he said. “This is one of those fairly old canards.”

Read the rest of the article at Reteurs.com. To learn more about the trial, visit the American Foundation for Equal Rights.

Maureen Dowd on Olson, Boies and Obama

admin — Mon, 18 Jan 2010 19:13:01 +0000

Noted New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd, opines on the unique legal team of former Solicitor General Ted Olson and prominent Democratic attorney David Boies, as they tackle the most significant legal challenge to restrictions on same-sex marriage:

In 2000, Olson and Boies sparred with each other in Washington over which candidate would marry the country. Now they have joined forces here to spar with Prop 8 defenders over who can marry.

“Ted Olson and David Boies, so what are they up to?” Olson laughed, summarizing the confusion and conspiracy theories that their union inspired.

As the sun set on the Bay Bridge behind him and the curtain dropped on the first week of the dramatic trial to challenge the constitutionality of the state’s ban on same-sex marriage, Olson reviewed the case: “We’re going to explain why allowing same-sex couples to have that same right that the rest of us have is not going to hurt heterosexual marriages. It has no point at all except some people don’t want to recognize gays and lesbians as normal, as human beings.”

Boies, wearing a flag pin on his lapel, said that the state of California is engaged in “gay bashing.” He spoke intensely about the gay and lesbian plaintiffs, who offered poignant testimony about their loving relationships and about wanting to be liked and accepted: “These people are people you would want your child to grow up and marry. You can be a child molester and get married. You can be a wife beater and get married. You can be a child-support scofflaw and get married. The importance of that emotional relationship is so vital to the pursuit of happiness that even prison felons, who aren’t really procreating, have a right to get married.”

…

I asked the lawyers if they were disappointed that the president who had once raised such hope in the gay community now seemed behind the curve.

“Damned right,” Boies snapped. “I hope my Democratic president will catch up to my conservative Republican co-counsel.”

Read the rest of Dowd’s column in the New York Times. To learn more about Olson and Boies’s case, visit the American Foundation for Equal Rights.

Conservatives Join the Fight for Marriage Equality

admin — Mon, 18 Jan 2010 18:43:10 +0000

Conservative Fox News Contributor and member of the Advisory Board of the America Foundation For Equal Rights, Margaret Hoover, penned a column for Fox News why she as a Republican is joing the fight to give gay and lesbian couples the right to marry.

I encourage everyone, but especially Republicans, to consider Mr. Olson’s arguments on the merits, both in his opening statement and throughout the trial’s ensuing three weeks. The plaintiff’s counsel seeks to convince Judge Vaughn R. Walker that the Supreme Court has already decided in Loving v. Virginia, Turner v. Safely, and in Lawrence v. Texas among others, that the right to marry is a fundamental right currently denied to an entire class of American citizens. This is unconstitutional.

We Republicans have often found ourselves on the wrong side of civil rights struggles since the 1960s, but there was a reason that Martin Luther King, Jr.’s father is said to have supported Republicans.

Republicans were historically the party ever-expanding freedom to disenfranchised minorities, from newly liberated slaves to giving women the right to vote. Susan B. Anthony was a Republican. By supporting the AFER trial we have an opportunity to establish our historic credibility on civil rights issues once again. But we should support marriage equality because it is the right thing to do.

Read the rest of Hoover’s column at FoxNews.com.

Ted Olson and Marriage Equality Take Center Stage

admin — Mon, 11 Jan 2010 19:44:45 +0000

As former United States Solicitor General Ted Olson and prominent Democratic attorney David Boies begin their trial seeking to overturn California’s Proposition 8, Olson has penned a column in Newsweek.

Many of my fellow conservatives have an almost knee-jerk hostility toward gay marriage. This does not make sense, because same-sex unions promote the values conservatives prize. Marriage is one of the basic building blocks of our neighborhoods and our nation. At its best, it is a stable bond between two individuals who work to create a loving household and a social and economic partnership. We encourage couples to marry because the commitments they make to one another provide benefits not only to themselves but also to their families and communities. Marriage requires thinking beyond one’s own needs. It transforms two individuals into a union based on shared aspirations, and in doing so establishes a formal investment in the well-being of society. The fact that individuals who happen to be gay want to share in this vital social institution is evidence that conservative ideals enjoy widespread acceptance. Conservatives should celebrate this, rather than lament it.

Legalizing same-sex marriage would also be a recognition of basic American principles, and would represent the culmination of our nation’s commitment to equal rights. It is, some have said, the last major civil-rights milestone yet to be surpassed in our two-century struggle to attain the goals we set for this nation at its formation.

This bedrock American principle of equality is central to the political and legal convictions of Republicans, Democrats, liberals, and conservatives alike. The dream that became America began with the revolutionary concept expressed in the Declaration of Independence in words that are among the most noble and elegant ever written: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

Click here to learn more about Olson and Boies’s case and the American Foundation for Equal Rights which is leading the charge to overturn Proposition 8 in the Courts.

Portugal Backs Gay Marriage

admin — Fri, 08 Jan 2010 15:59:17 +0000

Predominately Catholic Portugal will become the sixth Europoean nation to pass legislation giving gay and lesbian couples to marry.

“This law rights a wrong,” the prime minister, Jose Socrates, said in a speech to politicians, adding that it “simply ends pointless suffering”.

Socrates said the measure was part of his effort to modernise Portugal, where homosexuality was a crime until 1982. Two years ago his government lifted Portugal’s ban on abortion, despite church opposition.

Gay marriage is currently permitted in Belgium, the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden and Norway. Canada, South Africa and six US states also permit it.

The bill removes a reference in the current law to marriage being between two people of different sexes.

“It’s a slight change to the law, it’s true,” said Socrates. “But it is a very important and symbolic step towards fully ensuring respect for values that are essential in any democratic, open and tolerant society: the values of freedom, equality and non-discrimination.”